| Original Article | |
| Reproductive Rights in Transition: Legal Frameworks, Judicial Trends, and Public Health Impacts in India, France, and the United States | |
| Ankit Anand1, Priya Ranjan2, Rajneesh Kumar3, M. Shamima Parveen4, Gurminder Kaur3, Hrishikesh Manu5 | |
| 1School of Law, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur (KTR), SRM Nagar, Tamil Nadu, india 2Department of Economics, Pondicherry University, R. V. Nagar, Kalapet, Puducherry, India 3School of Law, Pondicherry University, R. V. Nagar, Kalapet, Puducherry, India 4Saveetha School of Law, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India 5Chanakya National Law University, Nyaya Nagar, Mithapur, Patna, Bihar, India |
|
|
IJWHR 2026; 14: 017-028 DOI: 10.15296/ijwhr.2026.9091 Viewed : 165 times Downloaded : 189 times. Keywords : Abortion policy, Body autonomy, Constitutional rights, Legislative trends, Reproductive justice |
|
| Full Text(PDF) | Related Articles | |
| Abstract | |
Objectives: The reproductive rights debate in India, France and the United States points to how constitutionally protected rights, judicial reasoning, and health systems inform access to safe abortion. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971 in India has come a long way, but issues persist. Whereas France has continued to broaden the right to abortions, and recently even constitutionalised it, and on the other hand, the U.S. has moved in the opposite direction after the Dobbs v. Jackson case, which reversed Roe v. Wade. Materials and Methods: Aggregate data on abortion rates and indicators of maternal health status were collected from identified sources. Secondary data were thoroughly analysed to identify trends in abortion and maternal health outcomes in all three jurisdictions. The analysis produced time-trend graphics and descriptive visual charts to illustrate the evolution of the abortion rate. Results: France exhibits a steady progress in perinatal health outcomes along with a firm, and permissive legislation on abortion with significant post-legalisation reductions in abortion-related maternal mortality. The U.S. experiences sharp oscillations associated with the prohibitive policy changes, especially after Dobbs case, including post-Dobbs case service disruptions and earlier evidence of mortality reduction under Roe v. Wade case. While India shows progressive legal reforms but the health outcomes are mixed showing long-term maternal mortality ratio (MMR) decline, slowed progress post-2015, and pandemic-related maternal care disruption. Conclusions: Firm rights-based legal environments as is the case in France are linked to better health outcomes, while more restrictive contexts have been shown to reduce access and increase risks to health. Rights-based abortion laws are associated with lower abortion-related maternal mortality, while restrictive regimes show poorer outcomes. |
Cite By, Google Scholar
IJWHR ENDNOTE ® Style
Tutorials
Publication Charge
Women's Reproductive Health Research Center
About Journal