Login Contact Us
Oct 2020, Vol 8, Issue 4
Advanced Search
How do you find the scientific quality of the published articles on our web site?

Original Article
A Qualitative Comparison of Long- and Short-acting Hormonal Method: Users’ Perspectives on Method Selection in Rural Guatemala
Kirsten Austad1, 2, Pooja Shah1, Hannah Shryer1, Peter Rohloff1, Anita Chary1
1Wuqu’ Kawoq | Maya Health Alliance, 2da Avenida 3-48 Zona 3, Barrio Patacabaj, Tecpán, Chimaltenango, Guatemala
2Department of Family Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, Boston MA 02118

IJWHR 2020; 8: 338-346
DOI: 10.15296/ijwhr.2020.55
Viewed : 2252 times
Downloaded : 2550 times.

Keywords : Contraception, Family Planning, Reproductive Health, Indigenous, LARCs
Full Text(PDF) | Related Articles
Objectives: While short-acting hormonal contraception (SAHC) remains the most popular form of modern contraception in most low and middle-income countries (LMICs), the use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARCs)—specifically implants—is rising globally. A better understanding is needed of the factors influencing users’ method selection and satisfaction. In this qualitative study we compared experiences, preferences, and needs of current LARC and SAHC users.

Materials and Methods: We administered a survey and semi-structured qualitative interview focusing on determinants of method choice to 12 current implant users and 12 current SAHC users from a rural Maya community in Guatemala.

Results: Dissatisfaction with SAHC side effects was a major driver of method switching for current LARC users. SAHC users endured side effects of their methods to prevent pregnancy. The two groups held different perceptions of risks associated with LARCs. Neither group perceived LARC methods to be intrinsically more effective than SAHCs. Rather, women understood efficacy in terms of personal and individual experience with a method. Both groups valued user autonomy in method initiation, continuation, and termination.

Conclusions: We found important similarities and differences between LARC and SAHC users that can help family planning counselors in LMICs understand women’s method preferences. Future research should explore how to counsel women on method efficacy and how to ensure women’s autonomy within resource-poor service delivery environments.

Supplementary Materials
Supplementary file 1 Qualitative Interview Guide (translated from the original Spanish version).

Cite By, Google Scholar

Google Scholar

Articles by Austad K
Articles by Shah P
Articles by Shryer H
Articles by Rohloff P
Articles by Chary A


Articles by Kirsten Austad
Articles by Pooja Shah
Articles by Hannah Shryer
Articles by Peter Rohloff
Articles by Anita Chary

Submit Paper
Online Submission System
IJWHR ENDNOTE ® Style Tutorials Publication Charge Women's Reproductive Health Research Center About Journal
Publication Information
Published Article Statistics