Login Contact Us
December 2014, Vol 2, Issue 5
Advanced Search
Title
Authors
Keyword
Poll
How do you find the scientific quality of the published articles on our web site?
Original Article
Comparison of Performing and Not-Performing the Prophylactic Surgery for Urinary Incontinence in Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Parvin Bastani1, Neda Shoari2, Sakineh Haj Ebrahimi3, Fatemeh Mallah1, Azadeh Azadi2
1Associate Professor of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Women’s Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2Resident of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3Professor of Urology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

IJWHR 2014; 2: 311–315
DOI: 10.15296/ijwhr.2014.51
Viewed : 2459 times
Downloaded : 2795 times.

Keywords : Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Prophylaxis, Urinary Incontinence
Full Text(PDF) | Related Articles
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the Performing and not-performing of prophylactic surgery for urinary incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Materials and Methods: In a randomized controlled clinical trial that performed in department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Tabriz University of medical sciences on women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse without history of urinary incontinence. The effects of performing and not-performing of prophylactic surgery for urinary incontinence in women with advance pelvic organ prolapse evaluated.

Results: Mean age of patients was 53.83±5.52 year in the range of 41-66 year. Mean ICIQ-SF questionnaire scores at the first three questions in patients with pelvic organ prolapse with prophylactic surgery was 0.50±1.54 and in patients with pelvic organ prolapse without prophylactic surgery was 0.86±2.02. Significant difference was not found at the answers to the first question (P=0.507), the second question (P=0.415) and to the third question (P=0.445) ICIQ-SF questionnaire of in the patients advance pelvic organ prolapse underwent surgery for pelvic organ prolapse with and without prophylactic surgery.

Conclusion: As regards, a significant difference was not found in the prevention of urinary incontinence between groups with and without prophylactic surgery. Therefore, prophylactic surgery is not recommended routinely for all patients and only we will attempt to do this surgery in symptomatic patients and reduced the additional costs and complications associated with prophylactic surgery in other patients who actually did not need to do this surgery.

Cite By, Google Scholar

Google Scholar

Articles by Bastani P
Articles by Shoari N
Articles by Haj Ebrahimi S
Articles by Mallah F
Articles by Azadi A

PubMed

Articles by Parvin Bastani
Articles by Neda Shoari
Articles by Fatemeh Mallah
Articles by Azadeh Azadi

Submit Paper
Online Submission System
IJWHR ENDNOTE ® Style Tutorials Publication Charge Women's Reproductive Health Research Center About Journal
Publication Information
Published Article Statistics